UK Scraps 'Aim to Permit' Rule, Giving Councils Veto on Betting Shops

⏱ 3 min read

Prime Minister Andy Burnham announced on 11 August 2026 that his government would repeal the 'aim to permit' rule embedded in Section 153 of the Gambling Act 2005 — the statutory duty that has required local councils to approve gambling licence applications whenever an operator meets Gambling Commission criteria. The move hands local authorities an effective veto over new betting shops and adult gaming centres (AGCs) for the first time in more than two decades.

Industry reaction was swift and sharp. Entain, Flutter Entertainment, Evoke (William Hill) and Betfred have all announced shop closures in 2026 already, with 560 Entain outlets shutting since last year's budget raised gambling taxes. The retail sector employs roughly 37,500 people and operators warn the regulatory cascade — following April's Remote Gaming Duty hike to 40% and new online slots stake caps — is pushing bettors toward unlicensed platforms.

---

What the 'Aim to Permit' Rule Actually Meant

Since the Gambling Act 2005 came into force, Section 153 obliged licensing authorities to presume in favour of granting a gambling premises licence, provided the applicant demonstrated compliance with the Act's three licensing objectives — keeping gambling crime-free, ensuring it is conducted fairly, and protecting children and vulnerable people. Councils could attach conditions or refuse outright only when an applicant clearly fell short; local opposition from residents or concerns about the concentration of outlets in a high street were not, in law, grounds for refusal.

Burnham framed the repeal as part of a broader high-street revival agenda, grouping betting shops with vape stores and "rogue operators" that have, in his view, displaced the community-facing businesses residents prefer. Before becoming Prime Minister in July 2026, Burnham signed a council coalition letter — as Mayor of Greater Manchester — demanding this exact change.

---

The Legislative Path: New Act Required

Legal experts have flagged a significant complication: repealing Section 153 requires primary legislation, meaning the government cannot act by statutory instrument or ministerial direction alone. A new gambling bill — or amendments to an existing bill — must pass both Houses of Parliament.

The English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act 2026, which received Royal Assent on 29 April 2026, inserted a new Section 153A into the Gambling Act, creating Gambling Impact Assessments (GIAs) that let councils weigh the cumulative concentration of gambling premises when deciding on licence applications. Burnham's announcement signals the government intends to go further — removing the 'aim to permit' presumption entirely rather than simply adding a weighing mechanism alongside it. That deeper change will require another legislative vehicle and could open the door to broader Gambling Act reform.

Rule / Measure	Status	Effect on Operators
Section 153 'Aim to Permit'	Repeal announced Aug 2026; primary legislation needed	Councils gain effective veto over new betting shop / AGC licences
Section 153A Gambling Impact Assessments	In force since Apr 2026 (Devolution Act)	Cumulative concentration of outlets now a valid licence consideration
Remote Gaming Duty	40% from 1 Apr 2026 (was 21%)	Steepest single-step UK gambling tax rise on record
Online Slots Stake Caps	In force 2026: £5 (25+), £2 (under 25)	UKGC estimates 15–20% revenue reduction on highest-margin product

---

Operator Impact: A Sector Already Under Pressure

The 'aim to permit' repeal lands on a retail sector already contracting sharply. The April 40% Remote Gaming Duty — nearly doubling the previous 21% rate with no phase-in period — was described by analysts as the steepest single-step gambling tax rise in British history. Combined with online slots stake limits, operators face both compressed revenue and a higher tax rate on what remains.

• Entain (Coral, Ladbrokes): CEO Stella David confirmed 560 shop closures since the October 2025 budget, while urging the government not to conflate regulated betting shops with AGCs.
• Flutter Entertainment (Paddy Power): Among operators announcing closures in 2026 alongside rising compliance costs.
• Evoke (William Hill): Additional closures confirmed as tax pressure bites.
• Betfred: 132 shop closures and 600+ job cuts from September 2026 confirmed — citing the 40% Remote Gaming Duty, higher employer National Insurance contributions, and a 25% rise in UKGC licence fees from October 2026.

SBC News reported that the retail sector still directly supports 37,500 jobs and argues that footfall from betting shops sustains adjacent high-street businesses. Entain's Stella David also warned of knock-on consequences for British horse racing, which relies on betting shop levy contributions.

---

Industry Response and the Illegal Market Warning

The Betting and Gaming Council and individual operators have drawn a consistent line: tightening the regulated market does not eliminate demand — it redirects it. SBC News analysis published 17 August 2026 noted that multiple operators, including smaller independents such as Jennings Bet, have explicitly warned that the compounding pressure of tax hikes, stake limits and now licensing curbs is strengthening the unlicensed gambling market that operates outside UKGC oversight.

Jennings Bet CEO argued that the government "does not appreciate the distinction between a betting shop and an AGC," warning that broad restrictions will harm community-focused outlets while doing little to curtail the problem venues the policy targets. iGaming Business noted that the repeal could also trigger a wider reopening of Gambling Act reform — a prospect that would create further uncertainty for the entire UK iGaming sector.

Public opinion, however, skews in the government's favour. SBC News polling found that a majority of respondents supported giving councils more power to block new gambling outlets, framing the shops as high-street blight rather than community assets.

---

Sources

Primary and specialist trade sources used in this report, in order of citation.

Be very careful not to bundle our great traditional betting shops with AGCs — they have a very different style and tone, and lumping them together risks destroying something that serves millions of customers responsibly every day.

— Stella David, CEO, Entain · Response to Burnham's aim to permit repeal, August 2026