OGAI Orders App Stores and Banks to Halt India Online Gaming Ban

⏱ 3 min read

India's Online Gaming Authority (OGAI) issued its first major enforcement advisory on 29 July 2026, ordering app stores, streaming platforms, banks, telecoms, cloud providers, and advertising agencies to immediately stop enabling prohibited online money games — or face criminal penalties under the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025 (PROGA). The directive, signed by OGAI Secretary T. Santhosh, marks the regulator's deliberate shift from reactive website-blocking to active pressure on the entire digital supply chain that has kept real-money gaming accessible to Indian players since the ban took force on 1 May 2026.

The stakes for non-compliance are criminal. Entities that fail to disable gaming applications, block hosting, freeze fund authorisation, and pull advertising face up to five years imprisonment and fines of up to ₹2 crore for repeat violations. The advisory lands just as the Supreme Court of India accepts the constitutional challenge to PROGA itself for final hearing, creating a high-pressure dual timeline for an industry that has already written off ₹7,000 crore ($840 million) since the law passed Parliament on 21 August 2025.

---

Who Is Targeted and What They Must Do

The OGAI advisory cites Sections 5, 6, and 7 of PROGA and is addressed to seven distinct categories of digital intermediary. Each is required to review internal policies, build compliance systems, and suspend any activity that facilitates prohibited online money games. PROGA defines a money game as any game where users pay a fee or stake with a reasonable expectation of monetary gain — a definition that sweeps up fantasy sports, rummy, poker, and carrom alongside pure-chance gambling.

• Application stores — must disable or remove gambling apps from their India storefronts
• Cloud service providers — must block hosting infrastructure used by money-game platforms
• Telecom operators and ISPs — must refuse network-level access to non-compliant services
• Banks and financial institutions — must stop authorising transactions to or from online money-game operators
• Social media intermediaries — must remove or suppress promotional content for banned games
• OTT platforms — must not distribute or host prohibited gaming applications
• Advertising agencies — must pull all campaigns promoting online money games

OGAI also requires each entity to build "appropriate automated or manual internal compliance systems, procedures, checks and safeguards" — meaning a one-time policy review is not sufficient. Ongoing monitoring is now a legal obligation.

---

Penalties for Non-Compliance

The advisory lays out explicit criminal consequences drawn from PROGA's penal provisions. These are not civil fines — they expose officers of non-compliant companies to imprisonment alongside their organisations.

PROGA Section	Offence	First Violation	Repeat Violation
Section 5	Offering or facilitating money games	Up to 3 yrs + ₹1 crore fine	3–5 yrs + ₹1–2 crore fine
Section 6	Advertising prohibited games	Up to 2 yrs + ₹50 lakh fine	2–3 yrs + ₹50 lakh–₹1 crore
Section 7	Financial facilitation of money games	Up to 3 yrs + ₹1 crore fine	Up to 3 yrs + ₹1 crore fine
Section 14	Persistent non-compliance	OGAI may order ISPs to block the platform itself

Section 14 is the sharpest instrument available: it allows OGAI to direct ISPs to block access to a non-compliant intermediary's own platform — a consequence that could, for example, affect an app store's broader India operation, not just its gaming listings.

---

Enforcement Context: Supply-Chain Strategy

Prior enforcement under PROGA had been largely reactive. 242 illegal betting and gambling websites were blocked in January 2026, but URL-level blocking has proven porous — operators routinely use mirror domains, VPNs, and offshore payment rails to maintain Indian player access. The July 29 advisory reflects a structural pivot: rather than pursuing individual operators, OGAI is now targeting the infrastructure layer simultaneously across distribution, hosting, payments, and advertising.

One operational gap remains. OGAI's submission portal for gaming companies is still non-operational despite determination notices already being issued to operators, according to The Print's reporting. This limits the regulator's ability to fully close the formal compliance loop it has now triggered across the supply chain — and it may slow enforcement timelines even as the advisory's criminal exposure is live from the date of issue.

---

Impact on Operators and Bettors

For offshore operators currently serving Indian players, the advisory substantially raises compliance risk for every intermediary they rely on. If Indian banks freeze transaction rails, ISPs block domains, and app stores pull listings, the practical barriers to reaching Indian bettors increase sharply — even for platforms not incorporated in India. The threat is no longer regulatory inconvenience; it is criminal liability for payment processors and distribution partners who continue facilitating access.

The sector has already absorbed severe damage. India's real-money gaming industry wrote off over $840 million (₹7,000 crore) and shed more than 7,000 direct jobs in the months after PROGA passed. For Indian bettors, the supply-chain squeeze is likely to push more activity toward unregulated offshore platforms and cryptocurrency alternatives that sit entirely outside any consumer protection framework.

The Supreme Court of India accepted the constitutional challenge to PROGA for final hearing on 5 August 2026, before a bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, with operators including Dream Sports, Games24x7, and WinZO among petitioners arguing the blanket ban violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. A ruling in their favour could overturn the ban — but until then, the OGAI advisory represents the most aggressive enforcement action India's online gaming sector has faced to date.

---

Sources

Primary regulatory and original reporting sources used to verify claims in this article.

Organisations must immediately review their policies, implement compliance systems, and suspend any activities that amount to non-compliance — including disabling gaming applications, blocking hosting, stopping fund authorisation, and pulling related advertisements.

— T. Santhosh, Secretary, Online Gaming Authority of India · OGAI Advisory, 29 July 2026