Kalshi Loses New York Ruling as Prediction Markets Circuit Split Deepens

⏱ 3 min read

A federal judge in Manhattan has dealt Kalshi its most significant legal defeat, ruling on July 8, 2026 that a federal commodities licence does not shield the prediction market platform from New York's gambling enforcement. The decision by U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres of the Southern District of New York denied Kalshi's bid for a preliminary injunction in KalshiEX LLC v. Williams, finding that the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) does not preempt New York's gambling statutes under any recognised theory — express, field, or conflict.

The ruling lands while Kalshi is riding record trading figures: the platform posted $33 billion in total volume in June 2026 — up 84% from a previous high of $17.91 billion in May — driven largely by the 2026 FIFA World Cup, which alone generated $13.76 billion in Kalshi trades. The contrast between surging commercial momentum and mounting legal exposure defines the platform's position heading into the second half of 2026.

---

The Ruling

Judge Torres applied a presumption against federal preemption, requiring clear Congressional intent to override the states' traditional authority over gambling. She found no such intent in the CEA, concluding that Congress did not design the statute to regulate so broadly as to exclude all state gambling laws. Crucially, she noted that nothing prevents Kalshi from pursuing a licence under New York law — framing compliance, not preemption, as the viable path forward.

The court assumed, without finally deciding, that Kalshi's sports-event contracts qualify as "swaps" under the CEA. Even granting that classification, Torres ruled the preemption argument failed on all three grounds. Kalshi filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit the same day, keeping the legal fight alive but meaning New York enforcement can proceed in the interim.

---

Background: From Cease-and-Desist to Court

The case traces to October 24, 2025, when the New York State Gaming Commission sent Kalshi a cease-and-desist letter ordering the platform to stop offering sports wagering without a state licence. Kalshi sued within days, arguing the CEA grants the CFTC sole jurisdiction over its products and leaves no room for state involvement.

The CFTC itself added institutional weight to Kalshi's position. On June 10, 2026, the agency issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking aimed at formalising a framework for public-interest determinations on event contracts — a signal of federal intent to govern the space, with the comment window closing July 27, 2026. CFTC Chairman Michael Selig separately warned that the agency would not allow state governments to undermine the CFTC's authority over these markets. The Southern District of New York was unpersuaded.

---

A National Circuit Split

The Torres ruling creates a direct conflict with the Third Circuit's April 6, 2026 decision in KalshiEX LLC v. Flaherty, where a divided 2–1 panel — authored by Judge David Porter, joined by Chief Judge Michael Chagares — held that the CEA field- and conflict-preempts New Jersey's gambling enforcement against Kalshi's sports contracts. Judge Jane Roth's dissent characterised Kalshi's products as "virtually indistinguishable" from offerings on licensed sportsbooks.

Jurisdiction	Court	Ruling on CEA Preemption	Date	Outcome for Kalshi
New Jersey	3rd Circuit (appellate)	CEA preempts state gambling law	Apr 6, 2026	Win — injunction upheld
New York	S.D.N.Y. (district)	CEA does not preempt state gambling law	Jul 8, 2026	Loss — injunction denied
Tennessee	District court	CEA preempts state gambling law	2025–2026	Win
Nevada, Maryland, Ohio	Various district courts	State regulators prevailed at injunction stage	2025–2026	Loss

With conflicting rulings accumulating across circuits, legal analysts now consider a Supreme Court review a likely near-term outcome. The CFTC has also filed suit against Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois in a parallel campaign to block state-level enforcement against CFTC-licensed exchanges, broadening the federal-versus-state battleground further.

---

What Operators and Bettors Face Now

The practical effect of the New York ruling is immediate: Kalshi cannot legally offer unlicensed sports-event contracts to New York users while its appeal proceeds. For the licensed sportsbook industry operating across 38 states, the decision is broadly welcome — it preserves the regulatory moat that state licensing creates and affirms that no federal commodity licence is a shortcut around state gambling law.

• New York bettors lose access to Kalshi sports contracts in the interim; the platform must comply or withdraw from the state's sports-event market.
• Operators in Third Circuit states (New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware) face no immediate change — the April ruling still governs there.
• States with pending enforcement actions can now cite Torres's reasoning as persuasive authority to pursue their own cases.
• Prediction market platforms broadly face a patchwork compliance environment, with outcomes diverging state by state until a definitive ruling — likely from the Supreme Court — resolves the split.

The commercial stakes are underscored by Kalshi's June figures. Sports contracts represented roughly 85% of its $33 billion monthly volume, meaning state-by-state access restrictions cut directly into the platform's core revenue engine at the moment of its greatest commercial growth.

---

Sources

Primary sources listed first. All URLs verified at time of publication.

There is nothing preventing Kalshi from obtaining a licence pursuant to New York law.

— Judge Analisa Torres, U.S. District Judge, Southern District of New York · KalshiEX LLC v. Williams, July 8, 2026